picked and preserved at just the right time

Archive for the ‘News and Current Affairs’ Category

News Bits [09.22.09]

In News and Current Affairs on September 23, 2009 at 9:06 am

Cabinet who can’t back gov’t bet told to quit

Can the Government have a presidential bet??? The administration yes, but certainly not the Government.

And even if the administration party has chosen its pet… I’m sorry, I mean bet, Cabinet members who are not members of the administration’s political party or those who choose to support other than the administration’s candidate should not be forced to resign from their posts, unless they commit electioneering acts.

Malacañang’s call for the resignation of Cabinet members who refuse to support the administration’s candidate clearly shows that the administration seeks not the betterment of the Government but the perpetration of its rule.

There’s a world of a difference between serving with the administration and working for the Government.

—————

NP laughs off ‘Re-Villar-me’ tandem talk

For the sake of the Filipino people, please leave it at that. Let’s not equate popularity with good governance. Although, admittedly, political lineage cannot as well be presumed to result in good governance, let us not be hasty in adopting the extreme side of the coin. Be inquisitive. Be analytical. As they say, choose wisely.

—————

Reference: http://www.inquirer.net/

News Bits [09.18.09]

In News and Current Affairs on September 18, 2009 at 9:39 am

Catholic schools seek women’s law exemption

What happened to the virtue of compassion that you preach? Why don’t you practice them? Have you not, in your lifetime, been at fault?

Isn’t it true that you also refuse to accept children born out of wedlock? It scares me to think then of the type of education you will impart if your religious and academic freedoms entail you to discriminate and judge a person’s character and capability based on their past failings and shortcomings or, in the case of children out of wedlock, their parents’ indiscretion.

———-

Power failure will not stop polls — Comelec

What COMELEC assures us is that the power failure will not affect the conduct of automation. Oh surely it will not stop polls, but will it not affect the results? The assurance we need is that despite interruptions of whatever nature, the integrity of the results will not be affected.

———-

Reference: http://www.inquirer.net/

News Bits [09.09.09]

In News and Current Affairs on September 9, 2009 at 10:21 am

Mikey blames self for TV interview blunder

Of course it’s his fault. Whose fault could it be? He went there and answered the questions (or tried to). Why could his seeming stupidity and utter incapacity for coherence be blamed on someone else? Does he think it is a form of gallantry that he owns up to his blunder? Duh!

Maybe that’s how he was raised? Taught to never own up to a mistake he himself committed, to always pass the blame to others. Wow! The fruit of a poisonous tree.

He even believes he did the right thing because of text messages from friends. Birds of the same feathers perhaps?

——————

Ombudsman seeks to ‘protect confidentiality’ of SALN in new rules

Oh my! Even Wolverine will envy how hard the Ombudsman’s face is.

Oh by the way Sir, government people don’t file SALN because they trust you. They file that because they are required by law; the same law that requires you to make it accessible to the public.

I wonder whether the degree of difficulty obtaining copies of SALNs will differ for each personality (i.e., Administration and Opposition).

——————

Noynoy Aquino announces bid for presidency in 2010

The announcement the Filipino people has been waiting for. But then, how winnable is he?

Unless other presidentiables from the opposition do a Mar, Noynoy’s bid will not be as formidable as it should be. I’d like to see him unite the opposition, and fight the dark side of the force.

More importantly, and I think most would agree with me on this, that it’s far better seeing more of Shalani than Korina.

——————

Reference: http://www.gmanews.tv/index.html

News Bits [09.06.09]

In News and Current Affairs on September 6, 2009 at 12:35 am

49 governors back Teodoro’s Palace bid

With this kind of endorsement it looks like Sec. Teodoro moves a step further towards being the administration party’s standard bearer.

This makes things a lot more interesting considering that the opposition is encouraging Sen. Aquino to run for 2010.

If that happens, it’s Cojuangco vs. Aquino right?

————–

Arroyo declares Sept. 7 and 21 as non-working holidays

Oh this means I have more time to sleep and be merry… NOT!

Longer weekends = shorter deadlines. That translates to working on holidays. Yes I get paid for that, but geez what’s the holiday for then?

————–

Palace announces holiday exemptions

If BPOs and electronic industries are exempted from the declared non-working holidays, does it mean that their employees will get regular pay for work spent on a special holiday?

Sec. Remonde was quoted saying, “We all know that the operations of the BPO and the electronic industries are 24/7″ in explaining the grant of exemption. Sorry, but can you point out the connection here? People will still work sir. Their employers will just have to pay them higher. Is that what the real reason is?

—————

References: http://www.inquirer.net/ and http://www.gmanews.tv/index.html

News Bits [08.28.09]

In News and Current Affairs on August 28, 2009 at 9:30 am

Erap on re-election bid: age doesn’t matter

- Maybe it doesn’t, but Article VII, Sec. 4 of the Philippine Constitution does. Run Erap run… away from politics please. Stay in your house and take your Arthro. It might do you more good.

—————

Carlo J. Caparas mulls Senate bid

- Oh please do mull it over loooooooonger. Otherwise, we might as well start shooting for the film titled, “Massacre of the Filipino Nation”, directed by… you guessed it.

—————

LTFRB deploys night teams vs reckless bus drivers

- This is good. But how about reckless drivers during the day? And why only in EDSA? And why only now?? Adopting the better-late-than-never motto perhaps?

Reference: http://www.gmanews.tv/index.html

Fire Private Lawyers

In News and Current Affairs on December 4, 2008 at 4:29 pm

Fire private lawyers.  This was the advice given by SolGen Devanadera to OIC Nario of PCGG on account of the “inefficient and uncooperative” private lawyers retained by the latter to pursue ill-gotten wealth cases against the Marcoses and their cronies.

Sounds like a good advice right? Only if OSG also fires its “inefficient and uncooperative” lawyers who collect huge retainer fees from government agencies despite doing nothing. 

Most government agencies (except the OSG of course) would admit their OSG lawyer (in some agencies it’s “lawyers”) rarely gives due attention to their cases.  This is precisely the reason why government agencies hire private lawyers who are willing to at least do something with their pending cases. 

So doesn’t that solve the problem?  Not really. Government agencies can’t hire private lawyers without the approval of OSG and COA. However, OSG can approve hiring of private lawyers if it admits that it does not have enough lawyers to handle the cases of the requesting government agency. Now, can you honestly believe they will admit to such fact? Moreso when “[t]here is now a sufficient number of OSG lawyers to actively prosecute ill-gotten wealth cases instituted by the PCGG in the Sandiganbayan”.

Yeah right! I may agree with the claim on sufficiency of OSG lawyers, but not on the claim that they will actively prosecute cases, unless maybe when the case involves wide media attention.

 

Source:

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view_article.php?article_id=175996

Government Procurement [Entry No. 1]

In News and Current Affairs on October 22, 2008 at 2:35 pm

ISSUES:

1. Whether Bids and Awards Committee (BAC) members may authorize Technical Working Group (TWG) members as their representatives for purposes of initialing bids opened during bid openings.

2.  Whether initials of only 2 authorized TWG members are sufficient to comply with the requirement under Section 29 of R.A. 9184 and its IRR-A.

MY VIEWS:

1.  Yes.  The general rule, provided under Section 12.4 of the IRR-A, is that representatives of BAC members are not authorized to sign in behalf of BAC members.  Section 29 of the IRR-A, therefore, operates as an exception to that general rule in that it recognizes duly authorized representatives of BAC members present during bid opening to initial every page of the original copies of all bids received and opened.

2.  No. The requirement under Section 29 of the IRR-A is for all BAC members or their duly authorized representatives present during bid opening to initial every page of the original copies of all bids received and opened.  With 3 being the minimum number of BAC members – not counting their representatives – necessary to constitute quorum, the initials of 2 representatives clearly fall short of the clear and categorical requirement under Section 29, IRR-A.

Change the School Year Calendar

In News and Current Affairs on April 17, 2008 at 6:27 am

The start of another school year is just a couple of months away. The feeling of excitement being with friends again well up among the students. I know this to be true to most people but me. The first thing that comes to mind when I realize that school year is near is the difficulty of getting to school because of the rainy season.

Don’t get me wrong. I like rain – at least for the cool breeze that it brings. I also have nice childhood memories of the rainy season, e.g., running around the village with friends playing on pot holes and the gushing water along street gutters. In fact, between the summer and rainy seasons, I confess my preference over the latter. The only reason I appreciate summer is because of the fact that there are no classes. I don’t look forward to summer outings except for the bonding that results from it and the conversations at the beach about anything under the moon. Plus, I never really understood why we have to go swimming on summer. I’d always say, “If we wanted to quench the summer heat, why do it under the very same thing that makes it?”

Despite this rather unusual inclination to the rainy season, I have always wondered why the school year starts at the same period. It seems a bit odd that children are required to go to school when it is most dangerous for them to go out. As I see it, the school year should start on September and here are a few reasons why:

1. Rains make it difficult for students to go to school.

2. The welfare of students is more at risk during the rainy season than at summer.

3. Classes are more prone to suspension because of typhoons prevalent during the months of June to August.

4. In college, the second semester is divided by the Christmas break resulting in an awkward disruption of class schedule.

5. In law school, preparations for the bar will not get in the way of class schedule.

Of course, not everyone will agree with this. Some would say that the rainy season extends up to the month of October and there is no assurance that classes will not be suspended if it starts on September. Some would also argue that it will be more difficult for children to go to school and study on summer when the heat is stifling. Some would allege that we are just copying the system of US whose climate is entirely different from ours. Some are pessimistic that we will be hard pressed to change the academic year because it is deeply rooted in our culture. Some would even give the most trivial reason that swimming is a lot safer during summer than in rainy season.

First, I agree that starting the school year on September does not guarantee that no classes will be suspended due to typhoons. I believe though that the frequency of suspended classes will largely decrease. Since we cannot completely avoid the rainy reason, we might as well do something to diminish its unwanted effects on the academic system, i.e., suspension of classes.

Second, between the summer and rainy seasons, it is clear that the latter poses a more perilous situation for children. We live in a tropical country. As such, is it not right to assume that most, if not all, have better tolerance from heat than rain? If we think studying is more difficult for children during summer, then why do we enroll our children at summer camps or summer classes or both? Heat is stifling. Rain is dampening. So which is worse, leptospirosis or dehydration?

Third, why do we even have to care whether we are copying the US system or not? If something is good for the country and its citizens, does it make the initiative or change bad if the Americans thought of it first? We have to simply acknowledge that the current system is no longer beneficial to the country and accept the fact that change does not necessarily uproot the society from its culture.

Fourth, I think you will all agree with me that intellectual children are far more needed than better tanned ones.

On Charter Change

In News and Current Affairs on April 15, 2008 at 8:35 am

Something I wrote for my English for Lawyers class last 25 November 2005

Undeniably one of the most talked about national issue today is the charter change and the proposed move from the present Presidential system of government to a Parliamentary form, particularly Federal system. This has, in fact, been officially tagged as priority by no less than the President of the Republic herself, Her Excellency President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo during her State of the Nation Address this year – a move criticized by the opposition as a means to ensure or earn, or both, the support of majority of the Congress in her most trying moments. While shrouding this policy decision with political color would normally illicit more doubts than understanding, one must still take time off and consider the viability and propriety of such decision.

The Local Government Development Foundation in its publication entitled, “Primer on Local Government in a Federal System,” provided a comparative overview of Presidentialism vis-a-vis Parliamentarism. It may be well to discuss at least two (2) of the most important differences between the afore-mentioned systems of government.

First is with respect to the governance structure. In a Presidential system, there exists three (3) co-equal departments, namely, Executive, Legislative, and Judiciary. In a system of government such as this, the principle of inter-departmental courtesy is practiced; which promotes alienation of public policy making resulting to awkward situations such as that brought about by the issuance of Executive Order 464 directing officials under the Chief Executive to seek approval before attending Senate or Congressional hearings. In a Parliamentary system, the government power is lodged with a central body composed of a fusion of the executive and legislative functions/offices. While this set up removes the said hazard encountered in the Presidential system, it may be said that it lacks the proper check and balance present in the former.

Second is the manner by which the head of the government is chosen and the term within which he may serve. Under the Presidential system, the President is both head of government and head of state, and is chosen by the citizens through an election to serve for a fixed term. On the other hand, in a Parliamentary system of government, the President merely acts as the head of state and a Prime Minister is chosen by members of the Parliament to head the government for as long as a vote of no confidence is obtained for its termination. The two (2) mentioned characteristics of Presidential system have brought about several issues and scandals; the bes examples of which are the declaration of martial law and the blatant and massive elections cheating. While there is no absolute assurance that these will not occur under a Parliamentary system of government, it may however be maintained that the possibility of another martial rule or repetitive election manipulation may somehow be lessened, if not curtailed, due to the governance structure and period in a Parliamentary system.

It cannot be gainsaid that no form or system of government can address all problems and concerns that have hounded and are still hounding this nation. The fact that the Presidential system has not elevated the status of this country for the last seventy-five years does not necessarily mean that the system is faulted or inappropriate, or both, for our society. Also, the fact that Parliamentary system has contributed to the growth and success of other countries does not mean that it will, in the same manner, effect change once applied in this country. It is this writer’s opinion that whatever form of government a country chooses to adopt, it is the people that will ultimately steer the country towards progress and development. Thus, idea of change should not be focused on the type of government but on the type of attitude one adopts under a present circumstance.